3 ms·
How is this relevant to GPT4? What you're saying was already true... so what. Now people are unemployed because of GPT4 we're going to start making free TVs fo
by wokwokwok 4y ago
How is this relevant to GPT4?
What you're saying was already true... so what. Now people are unemployed because of GPT4 we're going to start making free TVs for everyone?
Dang. That's sure not what happened when all those people lost their jobs during covid (eg. restaurant staff).
I guess this time will be different?
That's uh... well, very optimistic.
- Terretta 4y agoHow is "Did we suddenly invent a magical TV making machine?" relevant to GPT-4? I replied to that. And: > already true so what OK, so we did invent it. Then we agree on that.
- wokwokwok 4y ago> I replied to that. Out of context. This entire thread is in the context of “gpt is going to destroy jobs”; the arbitrary “we need to disassociate working and basic necessities” isn’t an isolated socialist discourse. You can wax philosophical all you like, but you’re failing to address the fundamental reality. There is a physical limit of good and services available right now and no amount of magical posturing will make that untrue. Anything is possible in the future given unlimited time and resources, but this thread is not about that. It is about right now, people losing their jobs. What is being proposed here is not a solution to that problem. The ability for people to build things doesn’t mean they will. It’s pure speculation about what might possibly happen in the future. > Then we agree on that. I do not agree with you. You’re just making arbitrary speculative statements.