3 ms·
What I implied is that we should be more vigilant with chatGPT. I don't think it is common for an article to completely invent a reference that does not exist,
by zvmaz 4y ago
What I implied is that we should be more vigilant with chatGPT. I don't think it is common for an article to completely invent a reference that does not exist, but it is common in chatGPT.
- creata 4y agoYeah, it's like how I'd prefer JPEG artifacts to an upscaler that completely fabricates the details.
- zvmaz 4y agoHow did I not notice this analogy?! It is in fact true that a JPEG artifact upscaled with fabricated details is the same thing as a totally forged reference of a paper describing when to diagnose appendicitis in children. Thank you.
- creata 4y ago1. You know images can be used as evidence in court, right? 2. You know people can just follow up on references in papers, right? 3. You know things don't have to be exactly the same in severity to be comparable anyway, right? 4. I was going to delete my comment because it didn't say anything useful, but by then two hours had passed, so HN didn't let me. Thanks for being a dick, pal.
- zvmaz 4y ago> 1. You know images can be used as evidence in court, right? Good point, I haven't thought about that. I thought your comment was sarcastic, it isn't apparently. Mea culpa.