First of all that NG article and links in it are thought provoking, and second I disagree with the details of your facts on many levels. What is not explicitly

First of all that NG article and links in it are thought provoking, and second I disagree with the details of your facts on many levels. What is not explicitly said in that article though is that using science for political gain goes both ways. It is too easy to categorize every idea as antivaxxer just because it fits your narrative. I say this as a theoretical hardliner during covid that had to debate against lots of antivax people. There were many bad arguments used against antivaxxers.