3 ms·
How does drivers/owners consent justify sharing recording of collateral subjects? Recently there was a change to how Tesla records surroundings. But that was
by openplatypus 4y ago
How does drivers/owners consent justify sharing recording of collateral subjects?
Recently there was a change to how Tesla records surroundings.
But that was very recent change!
Sounds like every Tesla on the street is to be considered an accessory to privacy violation and subject to Tesla employee exploitation.
- sschueller 4y agoThey don't and that is a huge issue that EU governments should be addressing but they aren't. I can't legal place a camera on my house if any public road or sidewalk is visible as it violates privacy laws. I also need to probably signage if I have cameras. Dashcams are considered a gray area as generally they delete old footage and they stay on the device but such footage can not be used in court unless it is a very serious case. Tesla just ignores this and sends data to a DC in the Netherlands and no one knows what happens with the data. From what I know camera recordings when parked are only stored locally but from this it may be possible for Tesla to pull them?