Indeed LLMs are currently better at some things and worse at others than people, but I was comparing in terms of accuracy of provided info (assuming they know t

Indeed LLMs are currently better at some things and worse at others than people, but I was comparing in terms of accuracy of provided info (assuming they know the answer to whatever question was posed). An equal footing example would be something like seeing a statue of someone known and trying to remember when they were born (or what exactly they did) when the last time you heard about them was in high school years ago. Or like on which address is some restaurant, or to which pressure your bike or car tyres need inflating to. The type of data that both humans and LLMs are kind of bad at replicating perfectly. Also in terms of math I'd also definitely trust GPT 4 quite a bit and 3.5 not at all. For humans, well, it's definitely a range from one to the other.