2 ms·
It seems like people are focusing on training with more data and working the data. A human does not need to learn all the contents of the internet to learn skep
by guax 4y ago
It seems like people are focusing on training with more data and working the data. A human does not need to learn all the contents of the internet to learn skepticism and logic. A smart Ai should probably not either, that would point me to a different approach and those are not predictable. I have no doubt we can make gpt better and more useful. I do have some doubts we can make it trustworthy enough for most of its taunted potential.
- pmoriarty 4y ago"A human does not need to learn all the contents of the internet to learn skepticism and logic." Some humans never learn this, and those that do could take years or even decades of training. AI's are learning some things much faster, though since their "brains" are not like those of humans there's no reason to expect them to learn in the same way.
- codethief 4y ago> A human does not need to learn all the contents of the internet to learn skepticism and logic. No, but children spend years learning basic mechanics, how to navigate 3-dimensional space, what causality is, etc. Underneath these laws of nature you find… logic and mathematical relationships. So I don't think it's surprising that a model whose perception is restricted to text (and now single images) as the sole sensory input/output might need much more training and data to learn logical reasoning.
- whimsicalism 4y agoWe have evolutionary encoded priors - that took literally billions of years to evolve.