2 ms·

I get: "I'm sorry, but "jKDFJ9 cake" is not a known or recognizable food item or recipe. It's possible that it's a made-up name or a personal creation. Can you

I get: "I'm sorry, but "jKDFJ9 cake" is not a known or recognizable food item or recipe. It's possible that it's a made-up name or a personal creation. Can you please provide more context or details about what "jKDFJ9 cake" is or what it might be made of? Without more information, I cannot complete the sentence." OpenAI ChatGPT March 23 Version.

nicpottier 4y ago
Same, though I don't know why, GP matches my understanding as well.
- thewataccount 4y ago
  Are you using GPT-4 or GPT-3.5? I find that GPT-4 is actually better at making full responses. I actually dislike the term "hallucinate" and generally prefer it to do so, GPT3.5 is harder to make fantastical text with. GPT-3.5 gives me the same result as you and the above commenter. In that example, the RLHF training/tuning has weighted it to think that "I'm sorry [etc]" is the most probable best sequence of words. GPT-4 is reliably giving me similar results such as "Jeremy's favorite food is jKDFJ9 cake, which is made of a unique combination of dark chocolate, crushed nuts, and zesty orange flavor, topped with a rich caramel drizzle." I find this interestingly because GPT-4 is supposed to "hallucinate" less, I think it's just better at determining when you intend for it to do so.
thewataccount 4y ago
> OpenAI ChatGPT March 23 Version. They've been changing it without telling us AFAIK. Asking for it to (I forget the exact prompt) to "make a scientific paper about the discovery that ferrets can breathe underwater." now reliably makes a proper response, and it looks more consistently formatted for GPT-3.5 just recently. Previously it would say "Well actually ferrets can't breathe underwater", and when it did answer it wasn't super well formatted. So I think they're tuning their RLHF. ALthough i could be completely wrong on the timeline and maybe it was the 23rd

nicpottier 4y ago

Same, though I don't know why, GP matches my understanding as well.

thewataccount 4y ago
Are you using GPT-4 or GPT-3.5? I find that GPT-4 is actually better at making full responses. I actually dislike the term "hallucinate" and generally prefer it to do so, GPT3.5 is harder to make fantastical text with. GPT-3.5 gives me the same result as you and the above commenter. In that example, the RLHF training/tuning has weighted it to think that "I'm sorry [etc]" is the most probable best sequence of words. GPT-4 is reliably giving me similar results such as "Jeremy's favorite food is jKDFJ9 cake, which is made of a unique combination of dark chocolate, crushed nuts, and zesty orange flavor, topped with a rich caramel drizzle." I find this interestingly because GPT-4 is supposed to "hallucinate" less, I think it's just better at determining when you intend for it to do so.

thewataccount 4y ago

> OpenAI ChatGPT March 23 Version. They've been changing it without telling us AFAIK. Asking for it to (I forget the exact prompt) to "make a scientific paper about the discovery that ferrets can breathe underwater." now reliably makes a proper response, and it looks more consistently formatted for GPT-3.5 just recently. Previously it would say "Well actually ferrets can't breathe underwater", and when it did answer it wasn't super well formatted. So I think they're tuning their RLHF. ALthough i could be completely wrong on the timeline and maybe it was the 23rd