2 ms·
OK I concede it meets a definition of fractal. I'm recalling having seen Mandelbrot speak at my high school and identify a property of his eponymous set in part
by djtriptych 15y ago
OK I concede it meets a definition of fractal. I'm recalling having seen Mandelbrot speak at my high school and identify a property of his eponymous set in particular: that no matter how closely you zoom, no part of it ever appears to be a straight line, unlike, for instance, a circle.
I just feel cheated.
But sure, it's a fractal capped at a disappointingly low number of iterations.
Kinda like how an equilateral triangle is a sierpinski's gasket at zero iterations.
- m_for_monkey 15y agoTry the desktop version, this is a very limited alpha. But no, not even the desktop version offers unlimited precision. http://wmi.math.u-szeged.hu/xaos/doku.php http://wmi.math.u-szeged.hu/xaos/doku.php