> It's like a person on the internet -- in that it's wrong 20% of the time, often confidently so. But the distinction is it's less rude, and more knowledgeable.

> It's like a person on the internet -- in that it's wrong 20% of the time, often confidently so. But the distinction is it's less rude, and more knowledgeable. Do you think if it is trained on only factual content, it will only say factual things? How does that even really work? Is there research on this? How does it then work for claims that are not factual, like prescriptive statements? And what about fiction? Will it stop being able to write prose? What if I create new facts?