3 ms·
Video from a pair of eyes is many terabytes per year though. If you compress it with best codecs. Raw video would be closer to 1PB per year. I think people ove
by lostmsu 4y ago
Video from a pair of eyes is many terabytes per year though. If you compress it with best codecs. Raw video would be closer to 1PB per year.
I think people overestimate the data efficiency of the biological neural networks w.r.t. transformer models.
- actionfromafar 4y agoThe power effiency is pretty brutal though, in favour of bio-gelpacks.
- lostmsu 4y agoHow can you be sure about power efficiency, if you don't know how data efficiency compares? It is low power. But so is a phone running llama.cpp
- actionfromafar 4y agoYou must be pretty clever to write that, and you are human right? Your data effiency and power effiency seems top notch to me.
- lostmsu 4y agoMaybe I am, but how many are out there who aren't? And how many smartphones can run alpaca?
- Thiez 4y agoPeople with bad eyesight are not (to the best of my knowledge) less intelligent than those with perfect vision. We could probably supply video at a much lower resolution without significantly affecting the outcome.
- lostmsu 4y agoTrue, but it's not like sound and/or touch are low bandwidth channels either.