That has always been the case. You're approaching this backwards, probably because you're hoping it will allow you to continue to be dismissive without having

That has always been the case. You're approaching this backwards, probably because you're hoping it will allow you to continue to be dismissive without having to put forward an argument of merit based upon the facts. You're also missing the obvious. He could have just retired if he believed this so strongly yet was unable to _convince_ the legislature to pass the law. He clearly wants the job more than he wants his popularity. That is a person who cannot be trusted. This is obvious.