People can't copyright a style or a vibe or inspiration, so it's not steelmanning to jump from * "Can you point to examples of any small creators who would be

People can't copyright a style or a vibe or inspiration, so it's not steelmanning to jump from * "Can you point to examples of any small creators who would be better off if they had no legal copyright over their works?" to * "People often build on each other's work. Can you imagine situations where people can take inspiration from each other a whole lot earlier, or are allowed to borrow ideas sooner and more often?", it's just completely removing the concept of "copyright" from the question entirely and attempting to inject the false premise that "violating a creator's copyright is the same as sparking inspiration in someone else or citing a paper" (which is, itself, a straw man).