> invalidates your point completely Do you think that Stanford's legacy admission policy makes their student body indistinguishable from that of Pasadena City

> invalidates your point completely Do you think that Stanford's legacy admission policy makes their student body indistinguishable from that of Pasadena City College? Or that no standardized scoring system would reveal any population-wide differences in academic ability between a school which admits 1 of 25 applicants from another that admits 25 of 25 applicants? Hell, admissions rate alone is probably enough to tell a pretty good part of the story.