3 ms·
You are implying that the parent you saw biking with their child is at fault for endangering their child. No, the drunken driver and traffic engineering is at
by mslate 4y ago
You are implying that the parent you saw biking with their child is at fault for endangering their child.
No, the drunken driver and traffic engineering is at fault.
Some parents cannot afford a car or two, especially living in a city like San Francisco. You assume that they can.
This is what's not discussed enough.
- notch898a 4y agoI think you and I agree, but it's an interesting question. Neglect laws in the US are incredibly vague. Driving a vehicle for some unnecessary reason like to take a child to a water park for fun could be construed as abuse/neglect, as it unnecessarily exposes the child to danger. Our neglect, and child reporting laws, badly need overhauled because common sense it totally removed. People have been arrested for as little as letting the kid walk or be at the park independently. Things need reworded to make it clear it isn't neglectful unless the child is facing certain and imminent serious injury or death, or something along those lines.