3 ms·

I didn't keep reading because the author said something that completely lacked credibility. It he was so confident, then why the false assumption? Why not just

I didn't keep reading because the author said something that completely lacked credibility. It he was so confident, then why the false assumption? Why not just come up with some other line of thought / argument? But you missed that part. That's not on me. He said it, I didn't. That's not on me. I would have kept reading if my BS detector didn't go off. That's not on me. See?

BoiledCabbage 4y ago
Again you just keep digging. You just posting you being unaware of the answer isn't convincing anyone, because they read the article and understand it. > But you missed that part I didn't miss any part. I read the article so I know why you're wrong. It's really that simple. but you just keep digging... have fun dig away