I think based on the cornell link it's not trademark infringement. IIUC, "In Commerce" is a statutory requirement and the guys van doesn't meet any of the 4. I

I think based on the cornell link it's not trademark infringement. IIUC, "In Commerce" is a statutory requirement and the guys van doesn't meet any of the 4. It's a personal van after all so I don't get why you see the fake badages on a SUV as any different than this van. 1. The dude isn't advertising. 2. The van is not being moved from manufacturer (Subaru) to seller. 3. The van is not being registered for a trademark 4. The dude isn't advertising.