3 ms·
Like "fact checking", it's to discredit sources that their editorial staff disagrees with while promoting the sources that they do agree with. You don't have to
by havblue 4y ago
Like "fact checking", it's to discredit sources that their editorial staff disagrees with while promoting the sources that they do agree with. You don't have to entertain arguments with sources you disagree with if you've preemptively stated that they're untrustworthy.