> So I could see an argument going both ways I'm not sure I see your point. The label is 'government affiliated' not 'government owned' or 'government operated

> So I could see an argument going both ways I'm not sure I see your point. The label is 'government affiliated' not 'government owned' or 'government operated'. The argument for the label seems very clear. What would the argument against be? Edit: I was mistaken: Twitter originally drew a line between state funded and state editorial control. From Twitter's blog in 2020, "State-financed media organizations with editorial independence, like the BBC in the UK or NPR in the US for example, will not be labeled." [1] https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2020/new-labels-for-government-and-state-affiliated-media-accounts https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2020/new-label...