3 ms·

Edit: please disregard, the California senate bill seems to actually be a reference to the number's existing use. Given that it's a reference to a specific Cal

Edit: please disregard, the California senate bill seems to actually be a reference to the number's existing use. Given that it's a reference to a specific California prop, I don't think this is a problem in any way.

xnx 4y ago
> it's a reference to a specific California prop That seems like a retcon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_(cannabis_culture) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_(cannabis_culture)
- simiones 4y ago
  I had no idea, I had only heard about it from the bill... Thank you for correcting me!