4 ms·
So the government will get to decide whose business is defined as a 'platform' before they enforce this requirement of maintaining an API suitable for 3rd party
by stcroixx 4y ago
So the government will get to decide whose business is defined as a 'platform' before they enforce this requirement of maintaining an API suitable for 3rd party clients? Do they also decide what features are required to be in that API? I guess on a case by case basis?
Software in the pharma industry works kind of like this. That's why it can take months to years to make a tiny one line change to an application once it's been validated by the FDA.
- baq 4y agoAt some point a public company becomes an utility. I'd argue that Meta and Google are at this point, albeit for different reasons. The specifics are obviously difficult to reason about, but the scale of network effects and/or amount of internet communities which only exist as facebook groups or whatsapp groups and would simply be gone if either stopped existing is... troubling.
- mmcwilliams 4y agoAt the point that a public company becomes a utility, why not nationalize it? The alternative being presented here is that private companies should be legislated and regulated into behaving in a particular way which is an incredibly inefficient way to manage a public good.
- stanleydrew 4y agoHonestly in practice I'm not sure there's much difference. A "nationalized" utility would still be regulated by legislation to behave "correctly" when operated by the executive branch. See e.g. USPS.
- mmcwilliams 4y agoI think the difference between the USPS--which has laws preventing it from making a profit--and a US-based tech firm that profits by selling user data to advertisers would be a massive one.