> I didn't get that impression. I initially thought that it was gov mandated data, but I felt that given the available info in the article meant I couldn't bac

> I didn't get that impression. I initially thought that it was gov mandated data, but I felt that given the available info in the article meant I couldn't back up that as a statement so backed off. I would guess it's probably a mix of government mandated and business purposes, at the same time I suspect there's a bunch of info they want but that happens to overlap the gov requirements.