3 ms·
> (and no, telemetry doesn't count as "strictly necessary") I'll start with the caveat that I'm not a lawyer, but I wouldn't be so sure. For example, knowing w
by Vinnl 4y ago
> (and no, telemetry doesn't count as "strictly necessary")
I'll start with the caveat that I'm not a lawyer, but I wouldn't be so sure. For example, knowing when your tool breaks for a user so you can fix it sounds like something that you could argue is necessary to make sure the tool works for the user.
- Nextgrid 4y agoI think the standard for "strictly necessary" is whether that piece of data is necessary to provide the requested functionality. Does submitting an order form for some goods in any way depend on the telemetry requests you sent before/after? Would the order still go through if those requests were missing or fed fake data? If the answer to the above is true then "strictly necessary" would be difficult to apply. Of course the point is moot because so far GDPR enforcement is not only lacking to begin with but the cases that are investigated aren't given the right technical expertise to adequately determine those answers.