3 ms·
Hopefully it makes a real difference to compensate us for the never-ending, dark pattern cookie notices we have to endure as a result. Who wants a choice of 'Ac
by stormdennis 3y ago
Hopefully it makes a real difference to compensate us for the never-ending, dark pattern cookie notices we have to endure as a result. Who wants a choice of 'Accept all' or 'Manage your settings' on every second webpage they land on?
- tjoff 3y agoThey are not GDPR compliant anyway, they just try to fight it by making GDPR look bad. Look for alternatives for such pathetic sites. Even Google of all places "respects" it now (after pressure). It becomes noticeably better every year.
- raverbashing 3y agoThese companies comply with GDPR as much as alcoholics comply with drinking driving laws by keeping a bottle on the trunk and stopping to take a swig once in a while
- HPsquared 3y agoBig centralized sites want that.
- jacquesm 3y agoYour beef is with the companies that do this, not with the GDPR.
- xp84 3y agoA law which causes the whole web to be worse for no reason deserves criticism. Managing cookies belongs in the browser, a place auditable and adjustable by the user. Not on every website in the world. GDPR may have had good outcomes too, and I am neutral on all other aspects, but whatever part of EU and California regulation led directly to cookie banners is a colossal failure which has benefitted no one (except possibly the dozens of snake oil cookie banner products which pretend to comply).