> so for people focused on learning and doing good, some simple logic implies that there shouldn’t be an AI race. I think the author got the order wrong: ackno

> so for people focused on learning and doing good, some simple logic implies that there shouldn’t be an AI race. I think the author got the order wrong: acknowledging the race is what reinforces "safety". If there was no race whats the incentive to talk so much about safety? On the other hand I have a sense (although I won't bet on it) that just like Siri hype died out after a few months, so will chatGPT. the author (and the doom seekers who sign open letters) can rest assured for calmer days. After all, one still need to know what/how to talk to chatGPT. So much so that now there's are jobs for "prompt "engineering"" - it's so funny, because on one hand we are surprised by how smart(?) the responses are and yet we need to engineer the right questions to get the "best" answers.