Sounds like another Reuters beat-up. Start with dislike of Tesla/Musk, then write a "special report" on that basis. > "Reuters contacted more than 300 former T

Sounds like another Reuters beat-up. Start with dislike of Tesla/Musk, then write a "special report" on that basis. > "Reuters contacted more than 300 former Tesla employees " 300! They tried extra hard to dig up dirt. > "all speaking on condition of anonymity"... Of course. They don't work there any more, but happy to sling mud anonymously for Reuters clickbait. > "Reuters wasn’t able to obtain any of the shared videos or images"... Oh no! You'll have to write extra-descriptive words about the "shocking" images. > "The news agency wasn’t able to determine how widespread it was" So what exactly was Reuters able to determine? Not much. By the sounds of it, users elected to share video, and some 20-something meme junkies at Tesla shared a few images internally... which is slap-on-write level stuff. Nobody kept any of the images, nothing leaked except anonymous stories from ex-employees! > "Some former employees said the only sharing they observed was for legitimate work purposes".. So... contradictory reports about images that don't exist, that might have been shared internally, to a degree we can't determine. Got it!