4 ms·
ChatGPT isn’t capable of accusations. It predicts text. Sometimes inaccurately. That’s what those silly words are trying to indicate. It is why they are wor
by catchnear4321 4y ago
ChatGPT isn’t capable of accusations.
It predicts text. Sometimes inaccurately. That’s what those silly words are trying to indicate. It is why they are worth reading. There’s even a prompt to make sure the user reads it.
(Humans lie.)
What the human then does with the output may resemble an accusation, or may even be one.
I wonder if law professors take the time to read those silly words… I bet they do. All the more curious.
- justinclift 4y ago> ChatGPT isn’t capable of accusations. Heh Heh Heh That statement pretty much sums up the current situation, which seems to now be at the "tell it to the judge" point. :)
- rnk 4y agoThe person you are replying too keeps denying reality. He just defines chatgpt as not being able to make accusations, so then the false news articles it created with false names and accusations somehow by definition wasn't an accusation.
- lisasays 4y ago"There is no person behind what the algorithm emits, therefore no intent - hence, it's not an accusation." At least that's how I'm imagining the line of reasoning behind this point of view goes.
- nkrisc 4y agoWithin the context of law, you may be correct and it may be a distinction that matters. Practically speaking, it makes no difference.