It could totally be just a competitor of PayTM coming here trying to spread lies ¯\ (ツ) /¯ The requirement of proof is the other way around: If PayTM decides

It could totally be just a competitor of PayTM coming here trying to spread lies ¯\ (ツ) /¯ The requirement of proof is the other way around: If PayTM decides to sue the owner of the comment, it would be the owner of the comment to prove what he is saying.