3 ms·
No offense, but I think you're reading too much into my casual comments here to guide your understanding of waf, rather than the actual waf docs. Waf isn't opti
by bogwog 4y ago
No offense, but I think you're reading too much into my casual comments here to guide your understanding of waf, rather than the actual waf docs. Waf isn't optimized for clean builds (quite the contrary), and neither you nor I know whether the waf defaults are insufficient for whatever Buck is being used for. I just pointed out the existence of that "fast_partial" thing to show how deep into waf internals a project-specific optimization effort could go.
But discussions about optimization are pointless without real world measurements and data.
- lmm 4y agoThe fact that it's implemented and not on by default is a red flag any way you slice it. Either it's implemented but unreliable, or it's reliable but the maintainers don't think it's worth turning on for some reason (why?).