3 ms·
I think the idea is that if someone sold me their “9mm slug to the brain as-a-service” concept on the basis that 9mm slugs are perfectly safe, my estate would s
by singleshot_ 4y ago
I think the idea is that if someone sold me their “9mm slug to the brain as-a-service” concept on the basis that 9mm slugs are perfectly safe, my estate would still have a pretty good wrongful death case against them. There are some things (crimes, intentional torts) that are harder to disclaim than you might think.
- catchnear4321 4y agoYou assume a lot about what I think. But let’s continue along these lines. Have you read the disclaimers? Or are you treating ChatGPT like an unlocked firearm?
- singleshot_ 4y agoApologies. It is a lot harder to disclaim crime, recklessness, or malice than one might think. I admit: I have no earthly idea what you think and wouldn’t dream of assuming especially since you’re right here to answer questions. Fair catch. Yeah, I’ve read the legal language on the ChatGPT site. I’ve got no worry about an unlocked firearm but I treat ChatGPT like a disruptive technology that will likely cause a great deal of damage when it is used unwisely. I’m not sure what bearing that has on whether a disclaimer can effectively protect Microsoft et al. from liability here, but I hope you’re about to enlighten me.