3 ms·
That’s an argument against legal AI as well. The idea being that the citizen has a right to be heard by the state. And that an AI handling a case is not really
by leobg 4y ago
That’s an argument against legal AI as well. The idea being that the citizen has a right to be heard by the state. And that an AI handling a case is not really “hearing“ the citizen.
Then, again, before Al Capone, nobody in their right mind would’ve argued that the state should share the profits of criminals through income tax. That idea went down the drain very fast. Wouldn’t be surprised to see the same thing happening to the idea of “being heard“ by the state.