3 ms·

And did it have any note about not being a financial advisor? What else was said? I’m assuming there was more to it than that. We can move the goalposts to T

And did it have any note about not being a financial advisor? What else was said? I’m assuming there was more to it than that. We can move the goalposts to T&Cs being a problem, but that’s even further from AI being the problem. Wasn’t this supposed to be about the dangers of AI? This sounds, again, still, like the dangers of humans. With a new tool.

lisasays 4y ago
It's always been about the dangers of humans - specifically those who create and market products of this nature. With us as their unwilling test subjects.
- catchnear4321 4y ago
  Right. But that’s not ChatGPT. That’s OpenAI.
  - lisasays 4y ago
    That's not the product that's doing X, it's the company I would reckon that to the good (if not the vast) majority of those who will see their jobs either yanked away from them entirely, or otherwise negatively perturbed in some significant way by this technology; or who are acutely affected by the toxic content it will just as inevitably produce -- this distinction will be entirely moot.