Investors are often bothered by talent acquisitions since they get small returns when they're hoping for big winners. So that article's claim is probably false.

Investors are often bothered by talent acquisitions since they get small returns when they're hoping for big winners. So that article's claim is probably false. However, I wondered why it was worthwhile for the big companies to acquire for talent, since they're paying a lot more than standard salaries for people who might leave after 2 years. The article claims they don't want the status quo disrupted, but that doesn't really make sense, unless the startup is creating a product that will directly compete with them.