In fact they have a bunch of disclaimers warning users the exact opposite. Maybe buried in the fine print somewhere. Its own splash page, however, paints much

In fact they have a bunch of disclaimers warning users the exact opposite. Maybe buried in the fine print somewhere. Its own splash page, however, paints much more of a "what's not to like?" picture: We’ve trained a model called ChatGPT which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. Or in one of its "customer stories", it boast of how GPT-4 can act as "essentially the most knowledgeable person in your company": “You essentially have the knowledge of the most knowledgeable person in Wealth Management—instantly”, McMillan adds. “Think of it as having our Chief Investment Strategist, Chief Global Economist, Global Equities Strategist, and every other analyst around the globe on call for every advisor, every day. We believe that is a transformative capability for our company.” This sure sounds asymptotically close to "[portraying] the system as being credible and informative and authoritative", per the parent comment.