3 ms·
Going forward it is more of a mark that you are human rather than a bot because the explosion in llms/spam. The point of the verification badges was like swag
by HopenHeyHi 4y ago
Going forward it is more of a mark that you are human rather than a bot because the explosion in llms/spam.
The point of the verification badges was like swag at the oscars. It was perks for VIPs and that is what induced the celebrities to get on the platform originally.
If you just want Twitter to be a space for famous people, hack politicians and hack journalists, influencers, to hang out like a red carpet party with everybody else gawking at them... well yeah, you'd want to keep the old way.
That also means a citizen journalist with accurate information gets to shout into the void whereas a hack who called in a favor from a friend who works at Twitter gets a megaphone.
Do you like the system where normies get locked out of their Google accounts and have to come here or beg on Twitter for a googler to do them a solid? Not to mention that the checkmarked got to use the app with exclusive features and a better experience?
Why support a caste system? This way a NYT journalist is still marked as affiliated with the NYT, just with a different icon or exclusive perks.
- the_mitsuhiko 4y agoNot sure why a bot would be verified nor do i think that there is much of value to tell humans and bots apart. Some of the most spammy or vile content comes from actual humans.
- HopenHeyHi 4y agoSince it costs $8 and requires a credit card it will be much harder (not impossible) to spin up many spammy bots. You could still have good bots. Without paying for the checkmark the spammy bots/humans will have limited reach. Hopefully there will be less vile content in the future as a result. If not I'm sure they'll try something else.