3 ms·
It was absolutely intentional, because "glorified autocomplete" doesn't make waves while "artificial intelligence" gets tons of traction, usage, and money.
by fnimick 4y ago
It was absolutely intentional, because "glorified autocomplete" doesn't make waves while "artificial intelligence" gets tons of traction, usage, and money.
- thomastjeffery 4y agoThat mistake goes deeper than their presentation, though: every effort made by OpenAI to evaluate GPT is based on the false premise of its personification. Just take a look at the GPT-4 introduction: how do they illustrate that GPT-4 is an improvement from GPT-3? It scored better on the SAT! That data wouldn't have ever been taken into serious consideration if OpenAI actually understood its fallacious premise. Religious narrative is very often influenced by the motivation of religious followers, but that doesn't make the path from motivation to narrative intentional.