4 ms·

There are many academic definitions of AI, and I would bet ChatGPT would fit 90%+ of them. People get confused because they associate language with intelligenc

by epups 4y ago

There are many academic definitions of AI, and I would bet ChatGPT would fit 90%+ of them. People get confused because they associate language with intelligence, or maybe they are just not technically literate. I don't think we should abandon correctly used terminology because laymen did not catch up to it yet.

JumpCrisscross 4y ago
> are many academic definitions of AI, and I would bet ChatGPT would fit 90%+ of them This wasn't contested. > don't think we should abandon correctly used terminology because laymen did not catch up to it yet No. But the general understanding should be a consideration when marketing a product. (I'd also argue that the conventional definitions of artificiality and intelligence vastly predate the technical definitions of AI. The terminology was always aspirational. Sort of like autopilot.)