3 ms·
I don't think the problem with Tesla's autopilot is its name, but rather the misleading promises that were made by Musk. What is the definition of AI that "the
by epups 4y ago
I don't think the problem with Tesla's autopilot is its name, but rather the misleading promises that were made by Musk.
What is the definition of AI that "the public" uses, and where did you find it?
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> What is the definition of AI that "the public" uses, and where did you find it There isn't an agreed-upon definition academics use, either. (Intelligence, broadly, remains rigorously undefined.) But one component of the public definition involves a sense of "knowing," i.e. understanding what is true. This is a source of the confusion and frustration with GPT-4 providing "wrong" answers. The answers aren't usually technically wrong: they're linguistically and logically valid; but the public's expectations of what the model is supposed to be doing doesn't match what it does.
- epups 4y agoThere are many academic definitions of AI, and I would bet ChatGPT would fit 90%+ of them. People get confused because they associate language with intelligence, or maybe they are just not technically literate. I don't think we should abandon correctly used terminology because laymen did not catch up to it yet.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> are many academic definitions of AI, and I would bet ChatGPT would fit 90%+ of them This wasn't contested. > don't think we should abandon correctly used terminology because laymen did not catch up to it yet No. But the general understanding should be a consideration when marketing a product. (I'd also argue that the conventional definitions of artificiality and intelligence vastly predate the technical definitions of AI. The terminology was always aspirational. Sort of like autopilot.)