3 ms·
I am sorry but I did not understand your comment. As for Stoicism, it is a very hard philosophy to live by if one is not temperamentally inclined to the "sereni
by zvmaz 4y ago
I am sorry but I did not understand your comment. As for Stoicism, it is a very hard philosophy to live by if one is not temperamentally inclined to the "serenity to accept the things [one] cannot change, Courage to change the things [one] can, and Wisdom to know the difference".
- seizethecheese 4y agoBut the harder it is temperamentally, the more useful it is.
- zvmaz 4y agoI don't know. It certainly is an interesting intellectual movement. Bertrand Russell wrote scathingly of Stoicism in his History of Western Philosophy [1], to which Massimo Pigliucci, the author cited above in the comment, responded [2]. I tend to be sympathetic to Russell's critique now, as Stoicism did not "work" for me. [1] https://archive.org/details/TheHistoryOfWesternPhilosophy/page/n266/mode/1up https://archive.org/details/TheHistoryOfWesternPhilosophy/pa... [2] https://howtobeastoic.wordpress.com/2017/05/11/bertrand-russell-got-stoicism-seriously-wrong/ https://howtobeastoic.wordpress.com/2017/05/11/bertrand-russ...
- dashoffset 4y agoIf one is already temperamentally inclined to the "serenity to accept the things [one] cannot change, Courage to change the things [one] can, and Wisdom to know the difference", then they may not need Stoicism.