> Tainting public perception of renewables with cost-related FUD more strongly? Or maybe bring actual discussions into public perception, and not just the unqu

> Tainting public perception of renewables with cost-related FUD more strongly? Or maybe bring actual discussions into public perception, and not just the unquestioned undebatable "renewable everything will solve everything by magic"? > so everyone seems well enough aware of it. Of course very few are aware of it. All the discussion is doe-eyed "we just need to replace everything with renewables". No one talks about the need to overbuild, and how much. Storage is assumed a solved issue even though it's not anywhere near the required scale.