4 ms·
One reason that is good enough for me: HN is a bit of an echo chamber. It's maintained by a specific VC with specific opinions, which already was a source of so
by LaGrange 15y ago
One reason that is good enough for me: HN is a bit of an echo chamber. It's maintained by a specific VC with specific opinions, which already was a source of some controversy. While I don't see a problem with the existence of opinionated media, I do think it's healthy if we have alternatives. And being "european" is specifically beneficial, because it brings with itself a somewhat different perspective.
I'd probably use both (unless the other one dies, of course — just because it's useful doesn't mean it will work).
- rayhano 15y agoHackful will never replace Hacker News - it is for local entrepreneurs to have far more relevant discussion. Why would a European service need peer review from a predominantly US audience?
- reinhardt 15y agoUhm, because ambitious European services don't restrict themselves to the (often smaller and more conservative) local audience?