> And the question remains whether the court would reach a different result if it turns out that the named plaintiffs hold BZRX tokens. That could mean those pl

> And the question remains whether the court would reach a different result if it turns out that the named plaintiffs hold BZRX tokens. That could mean those plaintiffs are fatally conflicted from pursuing their claims, as they would effectively be both plaintiffs and defendants under their theory of the case. This is the part I don’t understand, if they succeed in making the case all “owners” are liable wouldn’t they equally be liable for the money they lost? And the thousand years to get paid back part — are you a hodl or not?