Worse. It was written by a low-quality content mill that is one step above spam. The Germany 'ban', for example? A German newspaper asked the Federal Commissio

Worse. It was written by a low-quality content mill that is one step above spam. The Germany 'ban', for example? A German newspaper asked the Federal Commissioner if it could be blocked, and he answered "In principle, it could be", then followed with a bunch of boring nuanced qualifications that nobody wants to read, like the fact that in Germany this would be a state-level decision, or that they have just asked the Italian authorities for more information. https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/nach-vorstoss-in-italien-man-kann-technologie-nicht-mit-verboten-aufhalten-diskussion-um-chatgpt-regulierung-in-deutschland/29075002.html https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/nach-vorsto... A couple of rounds of 'journalist' telephone game later, and it has become "ChatGPT Ban Spreads to Germany". Utter trash.