3 ms·
My challenge to the author is why can't maturity models be dynamic and continually improved. What is being suggested here is too complex and involves a lot of b
by _8j50 4y ago
My challenge to the author is why can't maturity models be dynamic and continually improved. What is being suggested here is too complex and involves a lot of busy work.
Why can't you, as part of the process implement a capabilty driven dynamic (as in you review and change it) maturity model?
I mean, capability driven sounds great to talk about but how do you go about implementing it? A maturity model is simple to define and measure. I worry about endless meetings with what is proposed here but maybe I misunderstood a few things.
- crabbone 4y agoThis reminds me how once my then girlfrend's friend brought a textbook from some course she took for MBA degree. We had to wait hours for a train, or our other friend was late... and so having nothing better to do, I tried reading that coursebook. At first, it was hard to work through the terminology, but once you get the hang of it, you realize that if only they used planer language, the whole book could've been refined int a few trite statements. Like... "reward diligent employees and avoid the neglectful ones" and so on. This post reads about just like that. I wish we had better insight into how to manage processes in programming businesses... but so far I haven't seen anything that truly goes beyond the obvious stuff. The only difference is how much the author is willing to elaborate on that obvious stuff.