4 ms·
Meh, Hanlon's Razor. I don't know about Italy, but so far, I don't expect legislative action regarding ChatGPT in Germany. It would be an insanely unpopular de
by inductive_magic 4y ago
Meh, Hanlon's Razor.
I don't know about Italy, but so far, I don't expect legislative action regarding ChatGPT in Germany. It would be an insanely unpopular decision and contribute nothing to SPD/FDP's voters. It doesn't add up, and the article is full of nothing.
The state of privacy in Germany can be summed up nicely by quoting the data privacy officer of Hamburg from a couple of weeks ago: "Principles for avoiding and minimizing the processing of personal information, which are enshrined in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), among other things, "will be unable to be upheld."
- AbrahamParangi 4y agoPet peeve but I think Hanlon’s Razor is fundamentally wrong. Any ecosystem where it’s believed is an ecosystem which evolutionarily favors malice, which implies that it’s not true. Thus, you should follow Hanlon’s razor only if others don’t.
- Avicebron 4y agoI'm not sure I follow? You don't think the current ecosystem favors malice? Even if I don't have actively malicious intentions, I think it's fair to say that if the actions I take to advance myself over others have negative externalities (at various scales obviously), I've engendered "malice" in the ecosystem.
- digging 4y agoIt took a couple reads, but I believe what they meant was: Any ecosystem where incompetence is assumed over malice creates material incentives for malice, because plausible deniability is fundamental to its environment. Therefore, malice is encouraged and becomes more likely, invalidating the theory. As for your reply, I'm not actually sure what to make of it or how it relates to the previous comment, so I can't comment.
- AbrahamParangi 3y agoIndeed, and let this be a lesson to myself in writing clearly!