2 ms·
I don't think anyone who actually uses chatgpt thinks it will replace the need for a human. The benefit is one human can do the work of two. It's a different th
by danielmarkbruce 4y ago
I don't think anyone who actually uses chatgpt thinks it will replace the need for a human. The benefit is one human can do the work of two. It's a different thing.
- JohnFen 4y ago> The benefit is one human can do the work of two. Which means that one person is no longer needed, where they were before. How is that not replacement?
- danielmarkbruce 4y agoI'm agreeing with you - but the post in question suggests ChatGPT won't do so much because judgement is still required. Implicit to that is the idea that it's replacing the need for a human entirely.
- JohnFen 4y agoI don't think it will replace the need for all human workers. But if it can replace even as little as a third of them, that's a disaster. If all people are needed for anymore is "judgement", then one person can do what several did before.