strlcpy is not needed, strcpy_s (not strncpy_s) is safe and is part of the C11 standard.| In fact, strlcpy is worse: * strlcpy truncates the source string to

strlcpy is not needed, strcpy_s (not strncpy_s) is safe and is part of the C11 standard.| In fact, strlcpy is worse: * strlcpy truncates the source string to fit in the destination (which is a security risk) * strlcpy does not perform all the runtime checks that strcpy_s does * strlcpy does not make failures obvious by setting the destination to a null string or calling a handler if the call fails.