2 ms·
But it was never sufficient? Any observable behavior can be computed by some neural network, so what were you getting at? Are you implying Pictionary was AGI-co
by nh23423fefe 4y ago
But it was never sufficient? Any observable behavior can be computed by some neural network, so what were you getting at? Are you implying Pictionary was AGI-complete but now its not?
Like, the only condition you are looking for is being subjectively impressed, which just means you are using a bad metric for threshold finding right?
- jfengel 4y agoI'm implying that I thought Pictionary was AI-complete, or very close to it, but I was wrong. I'm assuming that we're talking about a Pictionary in which you could draw any concept in the world. It would be vastly easier if you restricted it to just the actual Pictionary cards, but that's not the spirit of what I meant, and I don't think it's what my link above is doing. I believed that something that open-ended would not be feasible any time soon without effectively solving general intelligence. I think I'm wrong about that -- though I suppose it's still possible that it's just a matter of scaling what they've already got.