4 ms·
Yeah; there's way too much "humanity of the gaps" here recently. We don't have to fully understand the brain, or fully understand what LLMs are doing, to be ab
by danaris 4y ago
Yeah; there's way too much "humanity of the gaps" here recently.
We don't have to fully understand the brain, or fully understand what LLMs are doing, to be able to say that what LLMs are doing is neither that close to what the brain does, nor anything that we would recognize as consciousness or sentience. There is enough that we do understand about those things—and the ways in which they differ—to be able to say with great confidence that we are not particularly close to AGI with this.