2 ms·
What would that mean? And what version of "mutate the DOM via databinding" would win, because there are at least three different approaches used in various JS l
by shadowgovt 4y ago
What would that mean? And what version of "mutate the DOM via databinding" would win, because there are at least three different approaches used in various JS libraries?
Accessing the GPU in this way is something that can't be done without browser-level API support. You're describing a problem already solved in JS. Different category entirely.
- pier25 4y ago> What would that mean? Honestly no idea, but any native implementation would be more useful than a userland JS implementation. > Accessing the GPU in this way is something that can't be done without browser-level API support. That's true and it will open the door to many use cases. But still, mutating the DOM as efficiently as possible without a userland JS implementation is orders of magnitude more common and relevant to the web as it is today.