4 ms·
This article seems credible and actually made me feel as if I understood it, i.e. at some depth but not deeper than a relative layperson can grasp. What I can'
by stareatgoats 4y ago
This article seems credible and actually made me feel as if I understood it, i.e. at some depth but not deeper than a relative layperson can grasp.
What I can't understand is how the Bing chatbot can give me accurate links to sources but chatGPT4 on request gives me nonsensical URLs in 4 case of 5. It doesn't matter in the cases where I ask it to write a program: the verification is in the running of it. But to have real utility in general knowledge situations, verification through accurate links to sources is a must.
- lm28469 4y ago> What I can't understand is how the Bing chatbot can give me accurate links to sources but chatGPT4 on request gives me nonsensical URLs in 4 case of 5 The bing version might run a bing query, fetch the X top pages, run GPT on it, return a response based on what it read, and in the back assign the summary to the source
- stareatgoats 4y agoThat might be the reason, probably. I mostly wanted to complain TBH. But I'm assuming it's one of those wrinkles that will get ironed out in subsequent versions.
- rootusrootus 4y ago> It doesn't matter in the cases where I ask it to write a program: the verification is in the running of it. Even then. I've had it write programs that were syntactically correct and produced plausible, but incorrect behavior. I'm really careful about what I'll use GPT-generated code for. IMO write the tests yourself, at least.
- stareatgoats 4y agoAbsolutely! It is seldom correct right off the bat.